State aid - Refusal of the Commission to propose 'appropriate measures' pursuant to Article 93(1) of the Treaty - Action for annulment - Inadmissible.

«(State aid – Refusal of the Commission to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 93(1) of the Treaty – Action for annulment – Inadmissible)» Summary of the Judgment Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Refusal of the Commission to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 93(1) of the Treaty – Excluded(EC Treaty, Arts 93(1) and 173) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber, Extended Composition)22 October 1996 (1) ((State aid – Refusal of the Commission to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 93(1) of the Treaty – Action for annulment – Inadmissible)) applicant, intervener, v defendant, intervener, THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Third Chamber, Extended Composition), having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 2 July 1996, gives the following On those grounds, THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) Briët Vesterdorf Lindh Potocki Cooke H. Jung C.P. Briët Registrar President 1 – Language of the case: English.ECR