ECLI:EU:T:2007:142

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2007 – La Perla v OHIM – Worldgem Brands (NIMEI LA PERLA MODERN CLASSIC) (Case T-137/05) Community trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Community word mark NIMEI LA PERLA MODERN CLASSIC – Earlier national figurative and word marks la PERLA and LA PERLA PARFUMS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94 Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark enjoying a reputation (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(5)) (see para. 51) Re: APPEAL lodged against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2005 (Case R 537/2004-1) relating to cancellation proceedings between Gruppo La Perla SpA and Worldgem Brands – Gestão e Investimentos L da . Information relating to the case Registered Community trade mark of which cancellation sought: Word mark NIMEI LA PERLA MODERN CLASSIC for goods in Class 14 – Application No 713446 Proprietor of the contested Community trade mark: Worldgem Brands – Gestão e Investimentos Lda, formerly Cielo Brands – Gestão e Investimentos Lda Party applying for cancellation: Gruppo La Perla SpA Trade marks of the applicant for cancellation: Italian marks: la PERLA, for goods in Class 25 – Figurative mark No 769526; LA PERLA PARFUMS, for goods in Class 3 – Word mark No 776082; la PERLA, for goods in Classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 24, 25 and 35 – Figurative mark No 804992; la PERLA for goods in Class 3 – Figurative mark No GE 2002 C 000181 Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application upheld; Community trade mark cancelled Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal allowed: decision of the Cancellation Division set aside Operative part The Court: Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 January 2005 (Case R537/2004-1); Orders the intervener to bear its own costs and to bear one third of the applicant’s costs; Orders the applicant to bear two thirds of its own costs; Orders OHIM to bear its own costs.