Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark GLÄNSA - Earlier Community word mark GLANZ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 July 2011 – Inter IKEA Systems v OHIM – Meteor Controls (GLÄNSA) (Case T-88/10) Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark GLÄNSA – Earlier Community word mark GLANZ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 24-25, 45, 48) Re: ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 December 2009 (Case R 529/2009‑2) in relation to opposition proceedings between Meteor Controls International Ltd and Inter IKEA Systems BV. Operative part The Court: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Orders Inter IKEA Systems BV to pay the costs.